Manthana - Contemplation

98 lists progeny through all the above wives, including Kālindī, but not separately for Mitravindā, implying that they both are one and the same. Kālindī - Mitravindā, Satyā the daughter of king Nagnajit, the daughter of Jāmbavat Rohiṇī who was beautiful in form. And my favourite worshippable form of personal, accessible aspect of God - Lord Kṛṣṇa with Rukmiṇī and Satyabhāmā. The impersonal aspect of God - Paramātman. The personal aspect God, yet transcendatal - Nārāyaṇa, Vāsudēva and Viṣṇu, of the so-called Viṣṇu Gāyatrī in Taittirīya Up. Puruṣa-sūkta, directly address Lord Viṣṇu. One of the synonyms of Veda is Viṣṇu itself. Why is the Veda so important? Because, it is the basis of Dharma. Why these names? Let’s start with Ṡruti - the Vedas. Why would the Vedic Ṛṣi Abharvā repeat himself? Of course the whole gamut of other gods and goddesses, rishis, etc. are mentioned in that chapter, except for the wife of Brahmā, Dēvī Sarasvatī herself!

Queen Nāgnajitī/Satyā is also worshipped as Nīlā Dēvī in Mādhva sampradāya and Rāmānuja sampradāya. Rukmiṇī, Satyābhamā, queen Nagnajitī (or Nāgnajitī) daughter of king Nagnajit, Sudattā daughter of king Ṡaibya, and Lakṣmaṇā of the beautiful smiles. The daughter of the king of Madra (name not given), who possessed good conduct and auspicious eyes, the daughter of Satrājit Satyabhāmā, Lakṣmaṇā whose smiles were beautiful, and Sudattā the daughter of Ṡaibya, who was like an apsara in her beauty. I recently came across this nice explanation of the name Adhōkṣaja as applied to Lord Ṡrī Kṛṣṇa. 1. The name Bhadrā of Bhāgavata Purāṇa is not found. Note that there is no mention of weekday or yōga or karaṇa found in modern Panchangas. Note that all the recensions say seven, not eight wives, other than Rukmiṇī. Note that Ṡrī Kṛṣṇa didn’t have conchshell (ṡaṅkha) at this stage of the epic yet. There is a lot of variance in the names of wives of Lord Ṡrī Kṛṣṇa in different scriptures. Beautiful prayer to Lord Hari and Lord Vāsudeva from the benedictory verses of the Harivaṃṡa.

The above verses are found in both Northern and Southern recensions (but not in BORI, probably because Kashmiri mss. Instead, some hits are found for "manuṣyatva", Beautiful female yoga couple "mānuṣatva" and "mānuṣatā". But these words are unattested. A cursory search in the Mahabharata or Ramayana reveals the absence of both these words. No humanity in the Mahabharata or Ramayana? Only tithi-nakshatra-muhurta mattered in the times of Mahabharata. Most people today will say "mānavatā" or "mānavatva". I will tell you about his sons. When God descends to Earth, if he contradicts the Vedas, we will discard God Himself (c.f. Basically refering to the triad of moving living beings - dēva (god), tiryak (animal) and manuṣya (human). Instead of calling Lord Nārāyaṇa as Bhagavān, he is simply referred to as an ordinary dēva god (devō nārāyaṇas tasyāṃ) but Brahmā is addressed as Bhagavān (tasyāṁ sa bhagavān āste). The Lord ascended his swift golden chariot that had Tārkṣya (Garuḍa) as its flag.

Since Arya Samaj cannot digest this fact, the Hindi translation if Pt. However, Arya Samaj is peculiar in its rejection of the Puranas, specifically Ṡrīmad Bhāgavatam and Brahma Vaivarta Purana (which deals with Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa mythology) - see Swami Dayananda Sarasvati’s Ṛgvēdādi-bhāṣya-bhūmikā Ch. This seems to be a serious lapse and direct contradiction to the core tenets of Arya Samaj. In fact, the D3 mss. In fact, 18 Puranas are explicitly meant to exposit creation, dissolution, etc. owing to their Pan̄ca-lakṣaṇas. These are called "electional timings" in astrology. 3. Jāmbavatī seems to be called Pauravī (i.e., of Paurava or Pūru lineage) and Rohiṇī (born in that Rōhiṇī nakṣatra). Mitravindā - Kālindī, Jāmbavati of Paurava lineage and Subhīmā of Mādra lineage. Subhīmā), Lakṣmaṇā, Sudattā and Mitravindā. Probably she is same as Subhīmā aka Mādrī. Since only Kālindī is left out, she must be same as Mitravindā. Though Bhāgatava Purāṇa distinguishes them, here they must refer to same person, because:- if we take them to be two persons, then the numbers seven and eight would lead to miscalculation in both places. There are two places where the list is given (BORI chap. Despite being under the card, Ṡrī Kṛṣṇa wasn’t killed (BORI chap.